RELAY / Self-initiated concept
FIRST 90
Federal AI Adoption Communications Field Guide
A proposed approach to employee communications, manager support, and adoption measurement. Read and adapt the templates with the appropriate program owners.
Download the designed PDF with fillable worksheets
Start here
Who this is for
Program leads, communications teams, managers, and contractor partners preparing to introduce an organization-approved AI tool.
The planning premise
A rollout needs a specific work purpose, an accountable sponsor, clear boundaries, and a practical path from introduction to supported use. FIRST 90 organizes those communications into three phases.
Before day one
Confirm the authorized environment, approved uses and data, review responsibilities, support contacts, and the decision owner. Communications do not grant permission to use a tool or expand its approved scope.
How to use this guide
Adapt the worksheets with your program team. The 90-day timing is a proposed planning structure, not a federal requirement. Replace every bracketed item in sample copy and have the appropriate owners review it before use.
What to keep visible
Describe what is known, what still needs a decision, and when people will hear more. Offer accessible formats and a practical way to ask questions.
Audience map
Program sponsor
Needs: a defined work problem, success criteria, and decisions requiring leadership. Message: begin with an approved use case and an accountable review plan. Action: confirm scope, resources, and the decision cadence.
Managers and team leads
Needs: what changes, time for practice, and answers they can use. Message: your team will get a briefing, a practice path, and named support. Action: hold a team discussion and surface unresolved concerns.
Employees and pilot participants
Needs: approved tasks, permitted data, output review expectations, and a place to get help. Message: understand the boundaries before the first task. Action: complete an approved exercise and share friction.
IT, security, privacy, accessibility and records owners
Needs: accurate claims, issue routing, and alignment with agency procedures. Message: communications will use the boundaries you validate. Action: approve relevant guidance and provide an escalation route.
The 90-day plan
01 / PREPARE / DAYS 1-30
Choose one approved work scenario. Interview a small cross-section of participants. Capture a baseline, publish an approved FAQ, brief managers, and schedule supported practice. Decision at day 30: are scope, support, and review responsibilities clear enough to begin?
02 / PRACTICE / DAYS 31-60
Run guided exercises in the approved environment. Keep the cohort and task definition stable enough to interpret feedback. Offer office hours, log unresolved questions, and revise instructions. Decision at day 60: what must improve before broader use?
03 / SUSTAIN / DAYS 61-90
Repeat the selected work task, compare quality and completion evidence, refresh manager guidance, and identify ongoing owners. Decision at day 90: continue, adjust, expand within approved scope, or pause?
Rollout worksheet
Program and accountable owner
Record your program-specific answer.
Approved tool, environment and work task
Record your program-specific answer.
Who is in the cohort, and what changes for them?
Record your program-specific answer.
Which uses and data are permitted? Who confirms this?
Record your program-specific answer.
What evidence will show useful, acceptable-quality work?
Record your program-specific answer.
Support route, escalation owner and next decision date
Record your program-specific answer.
Manager conversation guide
Open with the purpose
We are introducing [approved tool] to support [specific work task]. For this phase, [cohort] will work within [approved scope]. The program owner is [name or role].
Explain what people need to do
Please review [approved guidance] and complete [practice activity] by [date]. Allow [time] for the activity. Use only the permitted data and environment described in that guidance.
Set the review expectation
Follow [approved output review procedure] before relying on or sharing a result. If a result appears wrong or a use is unclear, use [support route].
Invite questions without promising answers you do not have
What would make this useful in your work? What is unclear? What support would help? I will send unresolved questions to [owner] and share the next update on [date].
Close the loop
After the conversation, record themes, decisions needed, and responsible owners. Share a concise update that identifies what changed and what remains open.
Employee FAQ template
What can I use the tool for?
Use [tool] only for [approved tasks] in [approved environment]. The current guidance is at [location], owned by [role] and last reviewed on [date].
What information may I enter?
Follow [approved data-handling instructions]. If the information or use case is not covered, ask [named review route] before entering it.
Can I use its output immediately?
Apply [required review procedure] before use. Identify who checks factual accuracy, completeness, suitability, and any other program-specific requirements.
What if a result is inaccurate or inappropriate?
Use [support route] and follow [incident or issue procedure]. Include only the information permitted by that procedure. Do not paste sensitive content into an unapproved help channel.
Is participation required? Will my work change?
State the actual decision: [participation expectations], [changes to work], and [what remains undecided]. Do not promise employment outcomes or individual performance benefits.
How will feedback be used?
Explain [feedback channels], [who reviews feedback], [how findings will be reported], and [next update date]. Describe the actual collection and retention practices.
Internal communications calendar
Days 1-10 / Listen and define
Communications lead: interview participants and managers; establish top questions. Sponsor and technical owners: confirm approved scope and the decision path. Output: audience map and agreed brief.
Days 11-30 / Explain and prepare
Sponsor: introduce purpose and expectations. Communications lead: publish FAQ and manager kit. Managers: hold team discussions. Output: accessible guidance, named support, and confirmed practice plan.
Days 31-45 / Demonstrate and practice
Training lead: run guided exercises. Support lead: hold office hours and tag recurring issues. Output: practice evidence and a prioritized question log.
Days 46-60 / Respond and refine
Communications lead: publish a You asked / We clarified update. Program lead: review quality, friction, and readiness for any expansion. Output: revised guidance and decision record.
Days 61-90 / Reinforce and hand over
Managers: reinforce the approved workflow. Program lead: compare evidence with baseline, explain limits, and assign continuing owners. Output: sponsor readout and next-phase decision.
Adoption measurement
Understanding
Definition: participants who correctly answer the agreed scope and support questions / respondents. Record the question set and response rate. A self-reported confidence score answers a different question.
Guided practice
Definition: assigned participants who complete the approved exercise to the documented rubric / participants assigned. Record the cohort, task version, and completion window.
Sustained use
Definition: eligible cohort members completing the selected approved task in the defined follow-up window / eligible cohort members. Interpret with access, workload, quality, and task relevance.
Quality and work effort
Compare a defined task against a baseline using the same rubric and similar conditions. Record errors, rework, and time including review. Describe sample size and differences in task complexity.
Support and friction
Track open issues, repeated questions, and time to resolution by issue type. A rise in questions can reflect better reporting, so review the themes before drawing a conclusion.
Sponsor readout worksheet
Measure and exact calculation
Record your program-specific answer.
Baseline, sample size, cohort and time period
Record your program-specific answer.
Current finding and data limitations
Record your program-specific answer.
What changed, and what might explain it?
Record your program-specific answer.
Decision requested, accountable owner and due date
Record your program-specific answer.
Next check and evidence needed
Record your program-specific answer.
Readiness workshop
00-10 minutes / Establish the task
Confirm the work problem, approved environment, cohort, and what participants should be able to do after the exercise.
10-25 minutes / Surface the questions
Ask: what is useful, what is unclear, and where could someone get stuck? Separate communication gaps from technical or policy decisions.
25-40 minutes / Walk through the experience
Review one approved task from start to output review. Identify the instructions, support, and accessible formats people need at each step.
40-50 minutes / Assign the response
For each unresolved question, record a category, owner, decision date, and approved response channel. Route potential incidents through the established agency process.
50-60 minutes / Decide the next step
Agree what must be ready before practice begins, who confirms it, and when participants receive the next update. Publish decisions and open questions in the shared guidance location.
Sources and use
GSA / Federal AI adoption context
GSA expanded its OneGov AI offering on September 10, 2026 and included training and enablement support. This provides context for the concept; it is not evidence of a RELAY engagement. Source: Open source
NIST / AI risk management resources
The AI Resource Center links the voluntary AI Risk Management Framework and its companion Playbook. Use the current resources with the appropriate program owners. FIRST 90 is an original communications structure. Source: Open source
Section508.gov / Accessible digital products
GSA provides guidance for documents, PDFs, presentations, meetings, social media, and other digital content. Review the formats and requirements applicable to your organization. Source: Open source
Credit
Self-initiated concept by Elizabeth Carpenter with AI-assisted production. No government affiliation or measured campaign results.